Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept
페이지 정보
작성일 23-02-06 13:33
본문
Download : Question Is deterren.doc
Jervis, Robert (1988), `The Political Effects of Nuclear Weapons`, International Security, 13 (Fall): 80-90
1. Introduction
설명
국제안보 보안 전쟁 억지력 냉전 이후 시대 Is deterrence still
Freedman, Lawrence (2005), Deterrence, Cambridge: Polity, chaps. 2-3, 8
Payne, Keith B.(1996), Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age, The University Press of Kentucky
1. Introduction
3. Conclusion
Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (1994), Joint Pub. 1-02, Washington, D.C.:GPO
After 1945, state leaders endeavoured to ban wars between states and in fact, the world has experienced few major wars since the end of the Second World War. This era was called the Cold War and it continued until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. During the Cold War, the strategy of deterrence worked effectively to prevent the Soviet Union from invading North Atlantic Treaty Organisation(NATO) countries. More specifically, nuclear weapons between two superpowers, the United Sates and the Soviet Union worked as a deterrent against mutually destructive wars (Walton & Gray, 2007: 209).
2. Is nuclear deterrence still useful?
Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept
i. The vertical vs. the horizontal proliferation
Levine, David K. & Levine, Robert A.(2006), ‘DETERRENCE IN THE COLD WAR AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17(6), December, pp. 605–617
순서
Keegan, John (1998), War and Our World, London
Bibliography
Wohlstetter, Albert (1959), `The Delicate Balance of Terror`, Foreign Affairs Vol. 37 (January): 209-234
It is hard to say whether such deterrence is still a useful strategic concept in the post-Cold War world because the international circumstances have changed in many ways since the end of the Cold War. It can be argued, however, that nuclear weapons have become less effective as a deterrent in the post-Cold War world than they were in the Cold War era. Nevertheless, we should keep in mind that nuclear weapons are still important in the contemporary world as seen in that ‘nuclear weapons remain the most awesome disciplinary instrument around’ (Freedman, 2005:121).
다.
Jervis, Robert (1989), The meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon, Ithaca: Cornel University Press, chaps. 1&2
Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein (1989), `Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter`, World Politics Vol. 41, No. 2: 208-224
Thayer, BRADLEY A. (2007), ‘Thinking about Nuclear Deterrence Theory: Why Evolutionary Psychology Undermines Its Rational Actor Assumptions’, Comparative Strategy, 26:311–323
영국 런던대학교에서 국제 관계학 석사 과정을 들을면서 작성했던 중간고사 영문 에세이입니다. Freedman, Lawrence (1994), War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Section E
ii. Rationality vs. irrationality
Walton and Gray, (2007) `The Second Nuclear Age: Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 10
Freedman, Lawrence (2003), The Revolution of Nuclear Strategy, London: Palgrave
iii. Bipolar vs. unipolar world
Download : Question Is deterren.doc( 22 )
국제 안보라는 수업을 수강하며 작성한 것으로 냉전 이후 시대에도 억지력이 아직 유효한 전쟁 억지 戰略인가를 질문으로 연구한 글입니다. 국제 안보라는 수업을 수강하며 작성한 것으로 냉전 이후 시대에도 억지력이 아직 유효한 전쟁 억지 전략인가를 질문으로 연구한 글입니다.
Since the beginning of human history, the world has continuously witnessed small and large-scale warfare among groups or states. There are a variety of reasons why state leaders wage a war, including religious, territorial, political, economic and cultural issues. State leaders and military strategists, however, do not engage in a war recklessly because they know how devastating a war can be. In particular, through the two most horrible world wars, the world suffered enormous damage and recognized that a war should be avoided.
참고 자료
Gray, Colin S. (1999), Modern Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chaps, 11-12
레포트 > 사회과학계열
Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press (2006), `The rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy`, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2:42-54
Ferris, (2007) `Conventional Power and Contemporary Warfare`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 12
영국 런던대학교에서 국제 관계학 석사 과정을 들을면서 작성했던 중간고사 영문 에세이입니다.
